MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171953104

Location Reparameterization and Default Priors for Statistical Analysis

2002· article· en· W2171953104 on OpenAlex
D. A. S. Fraser, Grace Y. Yi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Iranian Statistical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrior probabilityFrequentist inferenceMathematicsBayesian probabilityStatistical inferenceBayesian inferenceApplied mathematicsEconometricsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops default priors for Bayesian analysis that reproduce familiar frequentist and Bayesian analyses for models that are exponential or location. For the vector parameter case there is an information adjustment that avoids the Bayesian marginaliza- tion paradoxes and properly targets the prior on the parameter of interest thus adjusting for any complicating nonlinearity; the details of this vector Bayesian issue will be investigated in detail elsewhere. As in wide generality a statistical model has an inference component structure that is approximately exponential or approximately loca- tion to third order, this provides general default prior procedures that can be described as reweighting likelihood in accord with a Jereys' prior based on observed information. Two asymptotic models, that have variable and parameter of the same dimension and agree at a data point to first derivative con- ditional on an approximate ancillary, produce the same p-values to third order for inferences concerning scalar interest parameters. With

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it