MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172005856 · doi:10.5430/jst.v1n2p80

Sunitinib induced immune thrombocytopenia in patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2011· article· en· W2172005856 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mutahir A. Tunio, Shoaib Ahmad, Mohsin Fareed, Mushabbab AlAsiri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid Tumors · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunitinibMedicineRenal cell carcinomaTyrosine-kinase inhibitorRashNeutropeniaInternal medicineGastroenterologyImatinibAdverse effectOncologyCancerToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sunitinib (Sutent®: Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and imatinib-resistant metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Common non hematological side effects secondary to sunitinib are: fatigue (74%), diarrhea (55%), nausea (54%), altered taste (43%), skin rash (40%), hand foot syndrome (30%) and hypertension (28%). Common hematological side effects are neutropenia (53%) and thrombocytopenia (38%) secondary to myelosuppression. Here-in, we present case report of patient with inoperable metastatic left renal cell carcinoma who developed immune-mediated thrombocytopenia secondary to sunitinib and recovered successfully after sunitinib withdrawal. Differnetial diagnosis of drug induced immune mediated thrombocytopenia secondary to sunitinib must be made by oncologists in patients on sunitinib presenting as thrombocytopenia and in these cases sunitinib can safely be withdrawn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid TumorsSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207