MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172063670 · doi:10.1345/aph.1d363

Fenoldopam Versus Nitroprusside for the Treatment of Hypertensive Emergency

2004· article· en· W2172063670 on OpenAlexaff
John W. Devlin, Maria Seta, Salmaan Kanji, Allison L Somerville

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Pharmacotherapy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFenoldopamMedicineSodium nitroprussideAnesthesiaRenal functionCreatinineMean arterial pressureUrologyBlood pressureInternal medicineHeart rateAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: While sodium nitroprusside remains first-line therapy for hypertensive emergency (HEM), fenoldopam is increasingly being used because of its benign safety profile and potential renal protective effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of sodium nitroprusside versus fenoldopam for the treatment of HEM. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with HEM admitted to a university-affiliated, level 1 trauma center from 1999 to 2001 and treated with either nitroprusside (n = 21) or fenoldopam (n = 22) for >30 minutes. Time to reach mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal, change in MAP over time, time to initiation of oral antihypertensive therapy, change in renal function, incidence of cyanide toxicity, and cost of therapy were compared between groups. RESULTS: Demographic parameters were similar between groups, except renal failure, which was more prevalent in the fenoldopam group (10% vs 46%; p = 0.009). Neither the mean +/- SD pretreatment MAP (nitroprusside 168 +/- 19; fenoldopam 163 +/- 19; p = 0.45), time to reach MAP goal (3.6 [0.4-30] vs 4 [1-22] h; p = 0.51), nor infusion duration (18 [0.7-113] vs 18 [3-74] h; p = 0.45) differed between the patient groups. Time to initiation of oral antihypertensive therapy was similar between nitroprusside--(4.5 h [0.5-22] and fenoldopam--(6.5 h [1-100] treated patients; p = 0.65). Additional intravenous antihypertensives were administered to 16 patients in each group (p = 0.80). Change in creatinine clearance and incidence of tachycardia did not differ between groups. No symptoms of cyanide toxicity were detected. Cost of drug therapy was greater with fenoldopam (597.60 dollars, 199.20-6675.20 dollars); than nitroprusside (2.66 dollars, 1.68-3.48 dollars; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of HEM with fenoldopam appears to result in patient outcomes equivalent to those with nitroprusside but at a substantially higher cost. Further study is required to delineate the exact role of fenoldopam for treatment of HEM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of PharmacotherapySame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207