Tissue-Specific Effects of Rosiglitazone and Exercise in the Treatment of Lipid-Induced Insulin Resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both pharmacological intervention (i.e., thiazolidinediones [TZDs]) and lifestyle modification (i.e., exercise training) are clinically effective treatments for improving whole-body insulin sensitivity. However, the mechanism(s) by which these therapies reverse lipid-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle is unclear. We determined the effects of 4 weeks of rosiglitazone treatment and exercise training and their combined actions (rosiglitazone treatment and exercise training) on lipid and glucose metabolism in high-fat-fed rats. High-fat feeding resulted in decreased muscle insulin sensitivity, which was associated with increased rates of palmitate uptake and the accumulation of the fatty acid metabolites ceramide and diacylglycerol. Impairments in lipid metabolism were accompanied by defects in the Akt/AS160 signaling pathway. Exercise training, but not rosiglitazone treatment, reversed these impairments, resulting in improved insulin-stimulated glucose transport and increased rates of fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle. The improvements to glucose and lipid metabolism observed with exercise training were associated with increased AMP-activated protein kinase alpha1 activity; increased expression of Akt1, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1, and GLUT4; and a decrease in AS160 expression. In contrast, rosiglitazone treatment exacerbated lipid accumulation and decreased insulin-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle. However, rosiglitazone, but not exercise training, increased adipose tissue GLUT4 and acetyl CoA carboxylase expression. Both exercise training and rosiglitazone decreased liver triacylglycerol content. Although both interventions can improve whole-body insulin sensitivity, our results show that they produce divergent effects on protein expression and triglyceride storage in different tissues. Accordingly, exercise training and rosiglitazone may act as complementary therapies for the treatment of insulin resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".