MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172074131 · doi:10.1109/icton.2008.4598656

Optimization for minimizing fault localization time in all-optical networks

2008· article· en· W2172074131 on OpenAlex
Mazen G. Khair, Burak Kantarcı, Jun Zheng, Hussein T. Mouftah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInteger programmingFault (geology)Linear programmingOptimization problemProtocol (science)Matching (statistics)Mathematical optimizationComputer networkDistributed computingReal-time computingAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The limited perimeter vector matching (LVM) protocol is a novel fault localization protocol for localizing single-link failures in all-optical networks. In this paper, we study the optimization problem to minimize fault localization time when applying the LVM protocol to static all-optical networks, where traffic demands (or lightpath requests) are known a priori. Given the traffic demands, the optimization problem is to find a traffic distribution so that the time for localizing a failed link can be minimized. We formulate the problem into an integer linear programming problem and use CPLEX to solve the problem. We show through numerical results that by optimizing the traffic distribution the fault localization time can be effectively minimized and is below the OSPF localization time (40 msec) in traditional IP networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207