MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172076559 · doi:10.1051/medsci/20031910900

Le parasite Leishmania à l’ère de la post-génomique

2003· review· fr· W2172076559 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Ouellette, Martin Olivier, Sachiko Sato, Barbara Papadopoulou

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2003
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMolecular biologyBiologyLeishmaniaParasite hostingPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leishmania is a protozoan parasite responsible for considerable morbidity worldwide. The pathologies caused by Leishmania infections are varying with the species. The ongoing determination of the Leishmania major genome sequence represents a milestone for Leishmania research. We discuss here the use of transcriptomics and proteomics to accelerate our understanding of key processes related to Leishmania biology. These two techniques should be useful to find genes and proteins that are expressed in a stage-specific manner and examples of the use of such techniques are provided. Both approaches will complement each others. Indeed, while a number of stage-specific genes have increased stable RNA levels, an even larger subset of the Leishmania amastigote genes are regulated at the level of translation. The availability of the Leishmania genome should also permit important advances in finding species-specific genes that could explain different pathologies. Functional genomic and proteomic approaches should also be useful for understanding the mechanisms of drug resistance in the parasite. The availability of both the Leishmania genome and of its human host or of the mouse animal model will facilitate large scale studies and increase our understanding of host-pathogen interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesFrench-language works237,207