MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172088632 · doi:10.1155/2004/197484

Role of the Pathologist in the Diagnosis of Hereditary Non‐Polyposis Colorectal Cancer

2004· review· en· W2172088632 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisease Markers · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrosatellite instabilityDNA mismatch repairColorectal cancerMedicinePathologicalPathologyImmunohistochemistryCancerBiologyGeneInternal medicineMicrosatelliteGeneticsAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to indicate how the pathologist may suspect a diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) on the basis of histological criteria and patient age alone. A single morphological feature, namely the presence of intra-epithelial lymphocytes (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes), identifies the majority of colorectal cancers (CRC) with the DNA microsatellite instability-high phenotype. A number of pathological criteria can help to distinguish HNPCC from sporadic MSI-H CRC, though age below 60 years is an important pointer towards HNPCC. Immunohistochemistry to demonstrate loss of expression of DNA mismatch repair genes serves as a highly reliable test of mismatch repair deficiency if antibodies to hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6 and hPMS2 are employed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it