MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2172090223 · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.26

The impact of fitness level on self-report of concussion symptoms

2011· article· en· W2172090223 on OpenAlexaff
Constance Lebrun, Martin Mrázik, Dhiren Naidu, Joan Matthews-White, Alex Game

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionAthletesPhysical therapyMedicineTest (biology)Physical fitnessPsychologyInjury preventionPoison controlEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The diagnosis and management of concussion in sport rely heavily on self-report of symptoms by the athlete. However, many symptoms commonly reported after a concussion (headache, nausea, fatigue, etc.) may be influenced by other factors. Fatigue is a frequent complaint, but may actually be a function of level of physical fitness. Objective To evaluate the role of physical fitness on self-report of concussion symptoms in collegiate athletes and students, during baseline testing. Design Prospective repeated measures. Participants 125 subjects were recruited, including 95 collegiate athletes and 30 undergraduate students (83 males and 42 females). Athletes were screened for medical and psychological conditions. No athlete had a recent history of concussion. Intervention Subjects completed the Standardised Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT1) at three time periods: prior to a Leger (Beep) test, within 10 min of test completion, and within 24 h. The Leger test has established validity and reliability to estimate an athlete's V02 maximum and overall fitness levels. Main outcome measures Estimated V02 max (Leger test) and symptom scores on the SCAT1. Results Subjects were grouped into three levels of fitness according to criteria established by the American College of Sports Medicine (2010). A 3×3 repeated-measures ANOVA was not significant for the overall model but showed a significant interaction between time and fitness level (F (2, 121)=3.50, p=0.02). Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences in report of symptoms among the three fitness groups at baseline and immediately post-activity, but not at 24 h. Conclusion Results provide evidence of a moderating effect of fitness level on report of concussion symptoms at baseline, even in healthy adults. Specifically, exercise can induce symptom reporting, and may a function of an athlete's level of conditioning. Sport medicine professionals making decisions following concussion need to consider an athlete's level of fitness when evaluating post-concussion symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→