MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172099595 · doi:10.17169/fqs-7.2.122

Editorial: Responsibility, Solidarity, and Ethics in Cogenerative Dialogue as Research Methods

2008· editorial· en· W2172099595 on OpenAlexaff
Wolff‐Michael Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueForum: Qualitative Social Research (Freie Universität Berlin) · 2008
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityPsychologyEngineering ethicsResearch ethicsSociologyPolitical scienceEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602459

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.004
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0330.030
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.672
GPT teacher head0.727
Teacher spread0.055 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum: Qualitative Social Research (Freie Universität Berlin)Same topicEvaluation and Performance AssessmentFrench-language works237,207