MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172204434 · doi:10.5539/jas.v4n9p1

Estimation of Combining Ability and Gene Action for Improvement Drought Tolerance in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Using GGE Biplot Techniques

2012· article· en· W2172204434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ezatollah Farshadfar, Hojjat Hasheminasab, Anita Yaghotipoor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetics and Plant Breeding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiplotDrought toleranceRandomized block designDiallel crossHybridWater-use efficiencyAgronomyHeterosisGrain yieldMathematicsBiologyYield (engineering)BiotechnologyGenotypeIrrigationGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study of combining ability and gene action for drought tolerance in wheat were carried out using Genotype-by-Environment (GGE) biplot techniques. Eight-parental diallel crosses, excluding reciprocals, were grown in a randomized complete block design with three replications under two different water regimes (irrigated and rainfed) in the Agricultural Research Institute of Sararood, Kermanshah, Iran. Significant differences were found for yield potential (Yp), stress yield (Ys), stress tolerance index (STI), water use efficiency (WUE) and evapotranspiration efficiency (ETE). GGE biplot analysis showed that the parent A, A, A and B were the best general combiners with two additive genes (A1 and A2), for improvement of Y, STI, WUE and ETE under drought conditions, respectively. Parents A and C also exhibited positive GCA for all the studied traits. The crosses (A, D and H) × (C, E, F and G), (A, C and F) × (B, E, H and G), (A, C and E) × (B, G, H and F) and (A, C, G and D) × (F, B, E and H) for Y, STI, WUE and ETE were identified as heterotic groups with different dominant tolerance genes (D1 and D2), respectively. The polygon view of the biplot indicated that combining of A × G and A × C produced the best drought tolerance hybrids for all the traits through integrated the four tolerance genes (A1, A2, D1, and D2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicGenetics and Plant BreedingFrench-language works237,207