Activated caspase-6 and caspase-6-cleaved fragments of huntingtin specifically colocalize in the nucleus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteolysis of mutant huntingtin is crucial to the development of Huntington disease (HD). Specifically preventing proteolysis at the capase-6 (C6) consensus sequence at amino acid 586 of mutant huntingtin prevents the development of behavioural, motor and neuropathological features in a mouse model of HD. However, the mechanism underlying the selective toxicity of the 586 amino acid cleavage event is currently unknown. We have examined the subcellular localization of different caspase proteolytic fragments of huntingtin using neo-epitope antibodies. Our data suggest that the nucleus is the primary site of htt cleavage at amino acid 586. Endogenously cleaved 586 amino acid fragments are enriched in the nucleus of immortalized striatal cells and primary striatal neurons where they co-localize with active C6. Cell stress induced by staurosporine results in the nuclear translocation and activation of C6 and an increase in 586 amino acid fragments of huntingtin in the nucleus. In comparison, endogenous caspase-2/3-generated huntingtin 552 amino acid fragments localize to the perinuclear region. The different cellular itineraries of endogenously generated caspase products of huntingtin may provide an explanation for the selective toxicity of huntingtin fragments cleaved at amino acid 586.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".