MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172213404 · doi:10.1093/brain/awh306

Action myoclonus-renal failure syndrome: the definitive clinico-pathological description

2004· letter· en· W2172213404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2004
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyoclonusPathologicalMedicineAction (physics)NeurosciencePsychologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The causes of myoclonus are protean and often obscure; none more obscure than the action myoclonus–renal failure (AMRF) syndrome reported in four French Canadian patients from the province of Québec by Andermann et al. in 1986. In their current paper, Andermann and colleagues transform this condition from a local rarity to one of global significance, identified in families from Canada, the USA, Cuba, Europe and Australia (Badhwar et al., 2004). Patients in their series presented in the second and third decades of life with renal, neurological or combined features. Tremor was usually followed by the development of progressively disabling myoclonus on voluntary movement, coupled with cerebellar signs, infrequent generalized seizures, but preserved cognitive function. Renal disease presented as proteinuria and progressed to renal failure. Renal biopsy revealed collapsing glomerulopathy, a severe variant of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis that is more commonly seen in the setting of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Without treatment, death occurred 12 years or so after onset of the first symptom. Brain autopsy in two patients revealed extra-neuronal pigment accumulation. Segregation analyses were compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance. The common onset of AMRF with a fine tremor may lead to particular difficulties in diagnosis, and deserves further comment. The EEG finding of spike and spike–wave complexes and the evolution of the tremor into an action myoclonus make it likely that the early tremor is a variant of the relatively recently recognized cortical tremor syndrome (Ikeda et al., 1990). Although phenomenologically dominated by tremor, the latter is accompanied by cortical hyperexcitability indistinguishable from that in cortical myoclonus, and is commonly seen in the setting of epilepsy (Guerrini et al., 2001). Thus giant cortical evoked potentials, time-locked cortical correlates and excessive cortico-muscular coherence would be anticipated in AMRF and have been confirmed in a British sibship (Brown and Omerod, unpublished results). One of the major contributions of Andermann and colleagues has been to demonstrate that dialysis and renal transplantation are effective treatments for the renal failure, extending the lifespan in a disorder without cognitive involvement. Nevertheless, treatment of renal failure does not afford associated improvement in the neurological syndrome, which requires symptomatic therapy with antimyoclonic agents such as levetiracetam. The combination of myoclonus and renal failure raises an interesting differential diagnosis. It may be a direct consequence of uraemic encephalopathy, reversible with dialysis or transplantation, or have a more specific cause. Dialysis encephalopathy is caused by aluminium toxicity and is characterized by speech disturbance, seizures and myoclonus. It is at least partially reversible if treated with complete absence of oral aluminium intake and elimination by desferrioxamine. Drug toxicity in renal failure may also present with myoclonic encephalopathies (Martinez et al., 2001). The above causes are usually associated with some disturbance of conscious level, which is not the case in AMRF or in the rare May and White syndrome of myoclonic ataxia and deafness, which may also be associated with nephropathy, diabetes mellitus, infrequent seizures and dementia. Although familial, it is likely to be a mitochondrial cytopathy as abundant ragged red fibres may be found on muscle biopsy (Vaamonde et al., 1992). Finally AMRF should be distinguished from the rare Galloway–Mowat syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder, usually of infantile onset and associated with proteinuria, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, microcephaly and cerebellar disease. The pathological findings in the AMRF syndrome afford no direct clue as to the likely nature of the dysfunction within the CNS. No significant loss of cerebral cortical cells was seen. Paradoxically, relatively pure syndromes of cortical tremor and cortical myoclonus are usually associated with discrete cerebellar cortical disease, often with disproportionate loss of granule cells (Tijssen et al., 2000). The latter may lead to diminished excitation of Purkinje cells, release of the cerebellar nuclei from tonic inhibition by Purkinje cells and consequent increased excitation of the cerebral motor cortex and cortical myoclonus or tremor (Tijssen et al., 2000). The cerebellar signs and atrophy in AMRF also implicate the cerebellum in this condition, but granule cells were not explicitly mentioned in the account of Badhwar et al. (2004). On the other hand, pigment deposits were prominent in the Bergmann astrocytes of the cerebellar cortex, damage to which may cause a relatively selective secondary loss of granule cells (Cui et al., 2001). In the current issue of Brain, Andermann and colleagues succeed in defining the AMRF syndrome and highlighting it as a cause of progressive myoclonic ataxia across many continents. The extent to which it has been under-recognized and misdiagnosed as uraemic encephalopathy remains to be seen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0100.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207