A High Throughput Screening Algorithm for Leukemia Cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a high throughput screening algorithm for leukemia cells that has been designed, implemented, and tested. It performs a recursive image segmentation technique, row-wise and column-wise, on edge detected cell image. The recursive image segmentation successfully eliminates background pixels from foreground pixels by only segmenting image sections that contain relevant pixels. Then, the algorithm generates a boundary box for all identified cells. The next step of the proposed algorithm, the cluster classification, uses signature plots to classify single cells from cell clusters, and determine total cell count, size, and position. The proposed algorithm was successfully tested on various leukemia cell images. Also, when compared to manual counting using hemocytometer, the algorithm result matched the hemocytometer result. In addition, the algorithm took less than three seconds to process each image. Hence, the proposed algorithm determines relevant cell population statistics with 95% accuracy and avoids unnecessary delays in the cell screening process
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it