MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172458526 · doi:10.4000/acrh.5421

Les usages de Foucault en Argentine (1958-1989) : de l’homme nouveau à la fin du printemps démocratique

2014· article· fr· W2172458526 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana Canavese

Bibliographic record

VenueL Atelier du CRH · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesJurySpring (device)DemocracyArtArt historyPolitical scienceLawPoliticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composition du jury : Lila Caimari, Universidad de San Andrés;Roger Chartier, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales ;Frédéric Gros, Université Paris XII ;Horacio Paglione (Tarcus), Universidad de Buenos Aires. Thèse soutenue en cotutelle avec l’Université de Buenos Aires le 19 mars 2013. Mention très honorable avec félicitations du jury. Résumé : Les élaborations de Michel Foucault, parcourues par des intellectuels provenant de disciplines variées et d’origines idéologiques diverses, ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.012
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Atelier du CRHSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207