MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172606112 · doi:10.1525/tph.2015.37.2.144

Book Review: American Energy, Imperiled Coast: Oil and Gas Development in Louisiana’s Wetlands

2015· article· en· W2172606112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Adamek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Public Historian · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconDownloadCitationIndex (typography)Library scienceWetlandCorporationSocial mediaSearch engine optimizationHistoryEngineeringWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePolitical scienceSearch engineLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| May 01 2015 Book Review: American Energy, Imperiled Coast: Oil and Gas Development in Louisiana’s Wetlands American Energy, Imperiled Coast: Oil and Gas Development in Louisiana’s Wetlands by Jason P. Theriot. : Louisiana State University Press, 2014. vii + 271 pp.; illustrations, notes, selected bibliography, index; clothbound, $38.00. Anna Adamek Anna Adamek Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The Public Historian (2015) 37 (2): 144–146. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2015.37.2.144 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Anna Adamek; Book Review: American Energy, Imperiled Coast: Oil and Gas Development in Louisiana’s Wetlands. The Public Historian 1 May 2015; 37 (2): 144–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2015.37.2.144 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe Public Historian Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2015 by The Regents of the University of California and the National Council on Public History2015 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Public HistorianSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207