Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume: David Hersh et Alix Sideris enseignent le theâtre et l'ecriture theâtrale aux enfants de la region d'Ottawa et collaborent avec deux troupes, le Theatre La Salamandre pour les jeunes auditoires et les Jeunes Acteurs d'Orleans. Dans cette entrevue, ils presentent leur approche pedagogique, de la maternelle a l'ecole secondaire, laquelle vise a favoriser la decouverte de soi et la constitution de l'esprit de groupe. Ils examinent la difference entre le texte et le jeu theâtral, presentent le mouvement comme moyen de definir le personnage et, enfin, precisent les aptitudes que developpe la pratique du theâtre. Summary: David Hersh and Alix Sideris teach drama and theatre to children in the Ottawa area, working with two different companies: Salamander Theatre for Young Audiences and Orleans Young Players (OYP). This interview discusses their approach to drama from preschool to high school: it is a means both to individual self-discovery and to group-building. They examine the differences between drama and theatre, discuss movement as a method of finding character, and show how drama develops life-skills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".