Osmotic Stimuli Increase Clearance of Mucus in Patients with Mucociliary Dysfunction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mucociliary dysfunction results in mucus accumulation, airway obstruction, bacterial colonization, recurrent infective exacerbations, and an increase in morbidity and mortality. Studies in patients with cystic fibrosis, established that inhalation of hypertonic saline (HS) increases clearance of mucus acutely in a dose-dependent manner. Clearance over 90 min was 23.8 +/- 4.0% and 26.0 +/- 3.1% in response to 7% and 12% saline, which was significantly enhanced compared to 12.7 +/- 1.4% and 19.7 +/- 3.1% in response to 0.9% and 3% saline. Mannitol (approximately 300 mg) inhaled as a dry powder had a marked acute effect in patients with bronchiectasis. Clearance over 75 min was 34.0 +/- 5.0% with mannitol, 17.4 +/- 3.8% with control, and 11.7 +/- 4.4% at baseline. Further studies in patients with bronchiectasis showed that mannitol reduces the 24-h retention of radiolabeled mucus, suggesting that the effect of mannitol extends beyond the acute phase. Mannitol helped patients to clear mucus within 2 h that would have taken 24 h to clear without mannitol. A further study in CF patients showed that mannitol was equally effective as 6% HS at improving ciliary and cough clearance. The total clearance over 120 min with mannitol (27.6 +/- 3.7%) and with HS (31.0 +/- 5.5%) was significantly increased compared to their respective controls (18.6 +/- 3.8% and 20.9 +/- 3.6%). These preliminary results suggest that long-term treatment with HS or mannitol may benefit patients with mucociliary dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it