EFFICIENT, SWARM-BASED PATH FINDING IN UNKNOWN GRAPHS USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of steering a swarm of autonomous agents out of an unknown maze to some goal located at an unknown location.This is particularly the case in situations where no direct communication between the agents is possible and all information exchange between agents has to occur indirectly through information "deposited" in the environment.To address this task, an -greedy, collaborative reinforcement learning method using only local information exchanges is introduced in this paper to balance exploitation and exploration in the unknown maze and to optimize the ability of the swarm to exit from the maze.The learning and routing algorithm given here provides a mechanism for storing data needed to represent the collaborative utility function based on the experiences of previous agents visiting a node that results in routing decisions that improve with time.Two theorems show the theoretical soundness of the proposed learning method and illustrate the importance of the stored information in improving decision-making for routing.Simulation examples show that the introduced simple rules of learning from past experience significantly improve performance over random search and search based on Ant Colony Optimization, a metaheuristic algorithm. I. INTRODUCTIONThis paper presents a randomized, distributed approach to steer a swarm of agents out of any type of unknown maze to a goal located at some unknown location using only locally stored information and no direct communication between the agents.This is an important problem not only for groups of autonomous robots but also for minimum overhead distributed routing and graph search problems for a wide range of applications.The approach presented here employs a collaborative reinforcement learning (RL) framework and is based on formal results underlining the soundness of the approach.The problem of robot learning to escape a maze is not new to the machine learning research community; it was originally posed many decades back by H. Abelson and A. A. diSessa in [1].Since then, there has been a great deal of research in robots learning to navigate in and escape from a maze.In [5] an architecture for autonomous mobile agents is proposed that maps a two-dimensional environment, and provides safe paths to unexplored regions.In [6], algorithms are proposed for two heterogeneous robots searching for each
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".