Interpréter le non-respect du droit de la famille au Sénégal. La légitimité et les capacités de l’État en question
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article se propose de réfléchir aux manifestations et aux causes du non-recours généralisé au droit de la famille au Sénégal. Les controverses suscitées par le bouleversement des rapports de genre et la mise en cause de l’islam comme cadre de référence ont conduit à appréhender le non-recours comme un acte de résistance politique. Néanmoins, en réaction à la fragilisation croissante de sa légitimité et face à la montée d’un mouvement islamique radical, l’État a mis en place une politique en faveur d’un meilleur accès à la justice (2004) dont les résultats tendent à montrer que les populations se saisissent progressivement de leurs droits. La résistance à la norme étatique semble ainsi plus subie que choisie et invite à repenser les notions de légalité et de légitimité à partir de la norme pratique émergente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".