MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172858478 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab24

24 TRANSGENESIS AND NUCLEAR TRANSFER USING STEM CELLS FROM CULTURED PORCINE PRIMORDIAL GERM CELLS

2004· article· en· W2172858478 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kwang Sung Ahn, Haiyan Yang, Soon Young Heo, Hosup Shim

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsSomatic cellBiologySomatic cell nuclear transferTransgenesisBlastocystEmbryonic stem cellStem cellCell biologyEmbryoid bodyMolecular biologyElectrofusionDNA methylationAndrologyGeneticsEmbryoReproductive technologyAdult stem cellCryopreservationEmbryogenesisGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embryonic germ (EG) cells are undifferentiated stem cells isolated from cultured primordial germ cells (PGC). These cells share many characteristics with embryonic stem cells including their morphology and pluripotency. Undifferentiated porcine EG cell lines demonstrating capacities of both in vitro and in vivo differentiation have been established (Shim H et al. 1997 Biol. Reprod. 57, 1089–1095). Since EG cells can be cultured indefinitely in an undifferentiated state, whereas somatic cells in primary culture are often unstable and have limited lifespan, EG cells may provide an inexhaustible source of karyoplasts in nuclear transfer (NT). This would be particularly advantageous in maintaining nuclear donor cells carrying a transgene. In addition, genome-wide demethylation of DNA occurs in pre-implantation embryos as well as PGC. Nuclear transfer embryos using EG cells rather than somatic cells may be close to embryos from normal fertilization in their DNA methylation status. If combined with NT technique, EG cells may potentially be useful for genetic manipulation in pigs. In this study the efficiencies of transgenesis and NT using porcine fetal fibroblast and EG cells were compared. Two different techniques were used to perform NT. When conventional NT procedure (Roslin method) involving fusion of donor cells with enucleated oocytes was used, the rates of development to the blastocyst stage were 16.8% (59/351) and 14.1% (50/354) in EG and somatic cell NT, respectively. In piezo-driven micromanipulation (Honolulu method) involving direct injection of donor nuclei into enucleated oocytes, the rates of blastocyst formation in EG and somatic cell NT were 11.9% (15/126) and 7.5% (12/160), respectively. Although the differences between EG and somatic cell NT were statistically insignificant, the rates of blastocyst development in EG cell NT were comparable to the somatic cell counterpart regardless of NT methods used in the present study. To investigate if EG cells can be used for transgenesis in pigs, GFP gene was introduced into porcine EG cells. Nuclear transfer embryos using transfected EG cells gave rise to blastocysts (29/137, 21.2%), and all embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage expressed GFP, based on observation under fluorescence microscope. In this study, the possibility of using EG cells as karyoplast donors in NT procedure was tested. The results suggest that EG cell NT may be used as an alternative to somatic cell NT, and transgenic pig embryos may be produced using EG cells. This research was supported by a grant (SC14033) from Stem Cell Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207