MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W217290110

The Enduring Strength of Traditional and Recovered Stories

2006· article· en· W217290110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Violet Dutcher

Bibliographic record

VenueMagistra Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar dan Keislaman · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnabaptistsHistoryHEROLyricsLiteraturePoliticsDramaHymnPersecutionPoetryArtReligious studiesPhilosophyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

But what are our stories if not the mirrors we hold up to our fears?1 Martyrdom is never an affair of weakness, but rather of strength. Only a hero is able to walk the path of martyrdom.2 several centuries, Anabaptists3 have been called die Stillen im Lande (the Quiet in the Land). Julia Kasdorf points out that this phrase may have been borrowed from Psalm 35:20, For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful matters against those who are quiet in the land.4 Legend has it that while Anabaptists were certainly not quiet in the lands from which they originated, they learned this character trait through hard experience. After fleeing persecution in their homelands, Anabaptists found refuge in lands around the globe. To be quiet and uninvolved in the political dynamics of the surrounding societies meant survival. In 1995, this character trait took on a satirical twist in a musical/dramatic work based upon the writings of women of Mennonite, Conservative Mennonite, and Amish background. Several productions were staged of Quietly Landed?, telling stories of women of Anabaptist background, compiled by Carol Ann Weaver, Carol Penner, and Cheryl Nafziger-Leis.5 The authors of the writings and musical scores, actors, and director share backgrounds in the Mennonite religious tradition(s) and provide dramatic proof that Anabaptist female scholars are participating in the recovery of their histories. The drama is an eclectic production of Gregorian chants, blues, rap, poetry, and stories. One night in a small Canadian schoolhouse-tumed-theatre, the educated, mostly Mennonite audience sat in darkness, listening closely for the beginning of the evening's dramatic performance. To their surprise, the first act was preceded by a recording of the Lobsang, also known as O Gott Voter, wir Loben Dich (O God, Father, We Praise Thee). Written in 1590 by Lenhardt Clock and printed in the Ansbimd, the hymnbook of sixteenth century Anabaptists and contemporary Amish groups, it has several prescribed uses in the Amish church today. It is the second song sung at every Amish worship service. It is used at many Amish gatherings as a song of comfort, hope, and guidance and, where this hymn is located, (page 770), a special paper will be found in the Ambund during the choosing of a new Amish preacher, God's chosen servant.6 It is sung in the traditional manner, with one man singing out each line and the rest of the singers joining him to repeat the line. As the powerful voices of these Amish men filled the room during this dramatic production, suddenly, over these strong male voices, the audience heard the faint whisper of a woman's voice: can hardly talk. Over and over she repeated the phrase, and each time her voice grew louder and stronger, yet remained in a whisper: can hardly talk, can hardly talk, can hardly talk. Finding Voice Kathie Weaver Kurtz, the voice used in the drama, writes: When I was three years old my father borrowed a wire recorder. Those were the days before tape recorders, and recording was still a novelty. I watched, fascinated, as he turned knobs, spoke into the strange contraption in his hand, rewound the wire and then listened to himself speaking. Finally, not able to contain my eagerness, I blurted out boldly, want to talk through that. He smiled and held out the mike to me, but suddenly I was overcome with self-consciousness and could not think of a word to say. My mind was blank. In panic I responded with a voice that literally faded away, can ... I can hardly talk. My father silently took back the mike and proceeded to recite the poem he was practicing once again. I remember standing there feeling empty and disappointed and somehow deficient. The reason I remember the incident is that it was recorded - the whole thing, my bold request and then my voice fading away to complete inaudibility - if that's a word. The incident became a living metaphor for me in finding my voice as an adult, first in preaching and then as a pastoral counselor. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.029
Scholarly communication0.0140.016
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagistra Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar dan KeislamanSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207