MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172947550 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2015-0145

Multi-scale characterization of retention and shrinkage behaviour of four Australian clayey soils

2015· article· en· W2172947550 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xianfeng Liu, Olivier Buzzi, Shengyang Yuan, J. Mendes, Stephen Fityus

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsMercury intrusion porosimetryShrinkageSoil waterPorosimetryWettingGeotechnical engineeringMicroscale chemistryScanning electron microscopeWater retentionCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceMacroporeExpansive clayEnvironmental scanning electron microscopeGeologyMineralogySoil sciencePorosityComposite materialPorous mediumChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comprehensive experimental investigation on shrinkage and soil-water retention behaviour at macroscale and microscale of four natural Australian soils upon drying and wetting. Both reconstituted and intact states were tested. First, a comprehensive physicochemical characterization of the four soils was performed to provide a complete picture of the mineralogical composition and surface properties as well as different initial structure associated with reconstituted and intact states. Then, macroscale testing was conducted and complemented by microstructural analyses through mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations. These provided a comprehensive picture of the microfabric evolution of the soils tested along the drying–wetting path. All the experimental results were discussed in a coupled multi-scale manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207