MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172975492 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0344

Etiology of a recent white spruce decline: role of potassium deficiency, past disturbances, and climate change

2012· article· en· W2172975492 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rock Ouimet, Jean‐David Moore, Louis Duchesne, Claude Camiré

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal areaClimate changeTaigaEcosystemBorealForest ecologyBiologyEcologyForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Along with climate, multiple global or large-scale change agents shape forest ecosystem health. We present a case study where we attempted to elucidate the driving factors causing decline symptoms in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) in young spruce–fir boreal stands. Tree defoliation rate in the studied areas was related to the foliage discoloration intensity of the 2-year old needles and the decreasing stem basal area increment from 1997 to 2008. The onset of this growth decline in 1997 coincided with the occurrence of extremes for four climatic indices. The foliage of affected trees was deficient in K. The relationship between tree decline and K deficiency was tested through a diagnostic fertilization trial using a two-level factorial combination of N, K, and Mg. The trial indicated that K was the single limiting nutrient among the three tested elements. A single K addition increased stem basal area by 43% on average after 11 years. It is hypothesized that the poor K status of trees can be attributed to a series of natural and anthropogenic disturbances along with past forest management activities. Climate change in the region since the last decades also may have contributed to exacerbate K deficiency in such forest ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207