MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2173174370 · doi:10.4000/nrt.2485

Philippe Bernoux, Mieux-être au travail. Appropriation et reconnaissance, Toulouse, Octarès Éditions, 2015, 207 p.

2015· article· fr· W2173174370 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel Faulkner

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Nouvelle revue du travail · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsCenter for Diagnosis and Research on Alzheimer's Disease
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAppropriationPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C’est en fonction de la souffrance au travail que l’auteur aborde la question de l’appropriation (première partie de l’ouvrage) et de la reconnaissance du travail (seconde partie), voyant en celles-ci une façon de contrer le mal-être au travail. Chacune des deux parties est divisée en deux sections. Dans la première section de la première partie, l’auteur présente quelques exemples d’appropriation, alors qu’il revient sur les explications sociologiques du phénomène et qu’il ouvre la discussio...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Nouvelle revue du travailSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207