Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nucleic acid "lariats" have been of great interest to the biological community since their discovery two decades ago as splicing intermediates in the biosynthesis of messenger RNA (lariat RNA introns). We report here the first synthesis of lariat DNA and RNA via template-mediated chemical ligation of Y-shaped oligonucleotides. The method allows for the synthesis of lariat DNA of any base composition as well as the more biologically relevant lariat RNA. Typically, branched precursors and complementary linear templates ("splints") were dissolved in an equimolar ratio at a total concentration of 10(-4) M, and ligation was promoted by addition of cyanogen bromide in a pH 7.6 buffer. The template-directed cyclization was very efficient, since the amount of circularized lariat product observed in all cases was in the 40-60% range. The lariats were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and their structure and nucleotide composition confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Thermal denaturation and circular dichroism studies of lariat:RNA and lariat:DNA duplexes were fully supportive of the isolated "lasso" structures. Further characterization was conducted by enzymatic degradation with spleen phosphodiesterase (a 3'-exonuclease) and the RNA lariat debranching enzyme, a specific 2',5'-phosphodiesterase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".