Measurement of cyclic response of railway embankments and underlying soft peat foundations to heavy axle loads
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the deformation and pore-water pressure response within peat foundations below three different railway embankments in response to cyclic heavy axle loading. The study sites include two at Canadian National (CN) Railway's Edson and Lac-La-Biche subdivisions in northern Alberta, and one at CN′s Lévis subdivision in southeastern Quebec. The three sites were instrumented to monitor the spatial distribution of strain, pore pressure generation, and stress, and the distribution of horizontal cyclic displacement with depth during the passage of trains. The horizontal cyclic displacement with depth was measured using a ShapeAccelArray (SAA). An analysis was conducted to determine how close the peat is to yielding under heavy axle loads. This analysis was based on the elastic response determined from undrained triaxial testing, a constitutive model developed for peat, and finite element modelling. The field response and the numerical modelling suggest that the embankments at the northern Alberta sites are stable under current loading conditions. The highest potential for yielding at these sites occurs just beneath the embankment and at the interface between the peat and underlying stiffer soil. At the Lévis site the analysis suggests that a recently constructed ditch concentrates shear stress at a location where the principal stress orientation corresponds to a reduced strength of peat and may have increased the potential for yielding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it