Alleviating effect of<i>Mallotus roxburghianus</i>in heat-induced testicular dysfunction in Wistar rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Hyperthermia causes detrimental effects on the testes leading to fertility problems. Mallotus roxbhurghianus Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) is used in traditional medicine and possesses antioxidant property. However, the mechanisms remain unknown in the context of alleviative action of M. roxburghianus against heat stress. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the alleviating activity of M. roxburghianus and its mechanism in scrotal hyperthermia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scrotal hyperthermia experiments were performed in three groups (n = 7 per group) consisting of (i) the control group (C) maintained at 22 °C for 30 min, (ii) the heat stress-induced group (HS), and (iii) the heat stress-induced M. roxburghianus-treated group (HSM - 400 mg/kg each) in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 43 °C for 30 min. Subsequent to the heat treatment HS group, rats were treated with saline p.o and methanol extract of M. roxburghianus was administered to the rats of HSM group along with their standard food for 14 d. Scrotal hyperthermic effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Scrotal hyperthermia significantly (p < 0.0001) elevated malondialdehyde levels while decreasing the body and testes weights, serum testosterone, and antioxidant enzyme levels due to oxidative stress. Disorganisation of seminiferous tubules and arrest of spermatogenesis were observed in the HS group. The administration of methanol extract of M. roxburghianus (400 mg/kg) for 14 d after heat treatment significantly suppressed the lipid peroxidation, restored the antioxidant enzyme and testosterone levels, revived the spermatogenesis, and increased the cell proliferation activity in the HSM group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The methanol extract of M. roxburghianus accelerates testicular recovery from the damaging influence of hyperthermia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".