MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2173571680 · doi:10.1603/0046-225x-33.4.855

Premating Dispersion in the Egg Parasitoid<i>Trichogramma</i>(Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

2004· article· en· W2173571680 on OpenAlexafffund
Véronique Martel, Guy Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Entomology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrichogrammatidaeBiologyHymenopteraTrichogrammaParasitoidZoologyPopulationMatingBotanyEcologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gregarious and quasi-gregarious parasitoid females can either mate on the emergence patch or disperse and mate later. The temporal pattern of dispersion of males and females and the level of predispersal mating for females were measured in three egg parasitoid species: Trichogramma evanescens Westwood, Trichogramma minutum Riley, and Trichogramma pintoi Voegele (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Results showed that T. minutum has a higher proportion of virgin females in the dispersing population than T. pintoi and T. evanescens. However, the fact that a proportion of dispersing virgin females was found in all three species indicates some level of genetic exchanges between subpopulations of these egg parasitoids. Results suggest that all species can show partial local mating at different levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental EntomologySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207