Habitação de interesse social em cenários de revalorização urbana: considerações a partir da experiência carioca
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo O artigo tem por objetivo contribuir para o debate acadêmico em torno da incorporação do componente habitacional nas recentes experiências de revalorização de áreas urbanas centrais brasileiras. São apresentadas as conclusões obtidas a partir de uma pesquisa sobre a produção habitacional de interesse social na área central do Rio de Janeiro. As reflexões expostas são apoiadas numa análise do Programa Novas Alternativas, criado em 1996 pelo poder público municipal com o objetivo declarado de fomentar a produção habitacional nos bairros centrais da capital fluminense. Realizamos uma revisão das publicações institucionais da prefeitura sobre o tema e entrevistas com o quadro técnico do programa. Através desses elementos buscamos desvendar os componentes discursivos que embasam as ações do poder público municipal carioca em sua prática de fomento à produção habitacional
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".