MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BLACK OYSTERCATCHER NATAL PHILOPATRY IN THE QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS, BRITISH COLUMBIA

2002· article· en· W2173867557 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stephanie Hazlitt, Anthony J. Gaston

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wilson Bulletin · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsBirds Canada
FundersEarthwatch InstituteMinistry of EnvironmentBird Studies CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhilopatryBreedBayQueen (butterfly)GeographyEcologyBiologyZoologyDemographyArchaeologyPopulationBiological dispersalSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Very little demographic data is available for rocky intertidal shorebirds, including the long-lived Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani). In this paper we report on Black Oystercatcher chick production from 1992 to 2000, age of first breeding and natal philopatry in Laskeek Bay, Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Five percent of birds banded as half-grown chicks returned to breed in the same area. Known-age birds were 5 years old when first found breeding. This constitutes the first published evidence of natal philopatry for this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wilson BulletinSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207