MIMO Channel Capacity in Co-Channel Interference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent information theory results have indicated that a large channel capacity exists for wireless systems with multiple transmit and receive antennas. With different assumptions of channel knowledge and interference knowledge at the transmitter, the channel capacity of multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems has been studied under both spatially white and colored interference and noise. In this paper, we fix the total interference-plus-noise power and evaluate the outage capacity under two spatially colored interference environments: (1) a few high-data-rate interferers each with high power, (2) a large number of lowdata-rate interferers each with low power. The results show that MIMO capacity is larger with fewer high-data-rate interferers. We also assess the impact of an estimated channel and/or interference on capacity. In the case of 4 transmit and 4 receive antennas for the user of interest, 10 interferers, total-interference-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio are both 20dB, the results show that it is beneficial to estimate the channel and/or interference if the variance of estimation error is less than about 50% of the variance of true channel and/or interference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it