MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2174097169 · doi:10.5753/cbie.sbie.2015.1

Explorando uma Aplicação m-learning para Ensino de Vetores na Física do Ensino Médio

2015· article· pt· W2174097169 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Eduardo Sperle Honorato, Carlos Mendes, João Quadros, Rafael Castañeda, Jorge Soares, Renato Campos Mauro, Sérgio Duarte, Eduardo Ogasawara

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação/Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Bureau for International Education
KeywordsComputer scienceComprehensionReflection (computer programming)MultimediaMobile appsMathematics educationPsychologyWorld Wide WebProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The knowledge and understanding of vectors and vector quantities is extremely important to learn the motion of objects in physics at high school.Considering that vectors and vector quantities are a physics topic in which many students have difficulties, it is important to explore new ways to present them.In this vein, this study aims to explore a new m-learning application named Lab-Vetor.The application is designed for teaching and learning vectors on mobile devices.LabVetor can either be used by teachers in the classroom, through interactive whiteboards, and by the students at home as an m-learning training application.The LabVetor was evaluated by a group of students and showed to be a useful tool to assist the comprehension and reflection of the content learned in classroom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação/Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na EducaçãoSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207