MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2174335979 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0333

Europium-doped boro-bismuth-tellurite glasses for multicolor phosphor applications

2015· article· en· W2174335979 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Keshavamurthy, B. Eraiah

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorPhotoluminescencePhysicsEuropiumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)LuminescenceSpectroscopyDopingExcited stateBand gapOpticsAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The glass system (50–x)B 2 O 3 –30Bi 2 O 3 –20TeO 2 –xEu 2 O 3 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mol%) having been prepared using the conventional melt quenching method, is investigated in terms of physical, optical, and luminescence properties. The density of these glasses is measured and the corresponding molar volume is also calculated. The (αhν) 1/ n versus hν graph was plotted and it is well fitted to both direct (n = 1/2) and indirect (n = 2) band gaps. The direct and indirect band gap values range from 2.57 to 2.94 eV and 1.74 to 2.58 eV, respectively. The Urbach energy of the glass system was calculated to have values ranging from 0.29 to 0.62 eV. Yellow, orange, and red emissions have been observed through photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy excited at 464 nm and the obtained multicolor emissions have been demonstrated according to the Commission International de l’Eclairage de France 1931 standards. The results of PL studies indicated the possibility towards the development of multicolor phosphor applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207