« And in the sky, the dead and dancing sky, there are a million yesterdays » : l’horizon du passé dans City of the Mind de Penelope Lively
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans City of the Mind, Penelope Lively cartographie Londres en détournant la tradition moderniste du flâneur. Jouant sur le topos de l’architecte qui permet d’envisager l’horizon tant spatial — avec notamment l’impulsion verticale des bâtiments modernes pointant vers le ciel — que temporel, elle décline le paradigme du palimpseste, qu’il soit historique, littéraire ou architectural. Matthew Halland, le protagoniste, se voit confronté aux problèmes contemporains (un promoteur avide de corruption dans un Londres métissé, par exemple), mais il est aussi hanté par le passé, qu’il s’agisse de son propre passé (le désamour et l’échec d’un mariage) ou de celui de la cité. Le texte glisse ainsi vers l’époque victorienne ou le Blitz. Mais c’est au retour plus inattendu vers Frobisher que nous nous intéresserons ici, et à la fonction de ce collage qui crée une ligne de fuite dans le texte. En fin de compte, l’épisode de l’Inuit ramené de force fait punctum, pour problématiser le concept d’identité nationale, autant que personnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".