Cinacalcet Treatment in an Adolescent With Concurrent 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 3 Caused by<i>AP2S1</i>Mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DS) is a common multiple anomaly syndrome in which typical features include congenital heart defects, facial dysmorphism, and palatal anomalies. Hypocalcemia due to hypoparathyroidism is a common endocrine manifestation resulting from variable parathyroid hypoplasia, but hypercalcemia has not previously been reported in 22q11.2 DS. CASE DESCRIPTION: Our patient is a 16-year-old adolescent male with dysmorphic facial features and delayed motor and speech development. At 2 years of age, 22q11.2 DS was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. In contrast to hypoparathyroidism that is usually seen in 22q11.2 DS, this patient had early childhood-onset hypercalcemia with inappropriately high PTH levels and hypocalciuria. Genomic DNA was obtained from the proband and screened for calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) mutations with negative results. No parathyroid tissue could be localized by imaging or surgical exploration. As a result of symptomatic hypercalcemia, the patient was treated with a calcimimetic (cinacalcet). During the treatment, plasma calcium normalized with mild symptoms of hypocalcemia. After discontinuation of cinacalcet, calcium returned to high pretreatment levels. Further DNA analysis of adaptor protein-2 σ subunit (AP2S1) showed a heterozygous missense mutation c.44 G>T, resulting in a p.R15L substitution; the mutation was absent in the healthy parents and two siblings. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercalcemia in our patient with 22q11.2 DS could be explained by the de novo mutation in AP2S1. Identification of a genetic cause for hypercalcemia is helpful in guiding management and avoiding unnecessary treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".