MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2174831912 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0668

Unruh effect as foundation of universal gravitation within the cosmological scenario

2015· article· en· W2174831912 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cláudio Nassif, A. C. Amaro de Faria

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsUnruh effectCosmological constantDark energyGravitationUniversePlanckHubble volumeTheoretical physicsMetric expansion of spaceClassical mechanicsAstrophysicsQuantumCosmologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We aim to build a simple model of a gas with temperature (T) in thermal equilibrium with a black body that plays the role of the adiabatically expanding universe, so that each particle of such a gas mimics a kind of “particle” (quantum) of dark energy, which is inside a very small area of space so-called Planck area ([Formula: see text]), that is the minimum area of the whole space–time represented by a huge spherical surface with area [Formula: see text], ru being the Hubble radius. So we should realize that such a spherical surface is the surface of the black body for representing the universe, whose temperature (T) is related to an acceleration (a) of a proof particle that experiences its own black body radiation according to the Unruh effect. Thus, by using this model, we derive the law of universal gravitation, which leads us to understand the antigravity in the cosmological scenario and also estimate the tiny order of magnitude of the cosmological constant in agreement with the observational data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→