«Ey-m’ acá!» A prática performativa das Cantigas de Santa Maria em contextos não especializados: Uma perspectiva de etnomusicóloga, intérprete e pedagoga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A familiaridade da autora com as tradições orais, através da sua formação e actividade etnomusicológicas, fez com que, ao longo dos muitos anos de actuação profissional enquanto intérprete, levantasse questões e consolidasse convicções quanto à forma de abordar, na actualidade, as Cantigas de Santa Maria. Os problemas levantados incluem a relação com os ouvintes; o desfasamento acentual entre música e texto; as opções estilísticas a tomar, e seus referentes culturais; a integridade dos poemas e o papel dos refrães; o uso de instrumentos; e as múltiplas apropriações contemporâneas no âmbito mercantil das «Músicas do Mundo» ou da «Música de Fusão». Algumas das respostas que a experiência da autora sugere para o presente poderão ter igualmente o condão de iluminar as possibilidades de execução musical imagináveis para o passado medieval.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".