Disordered central cardiovascular regulation in portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portal hypertension due to either prehepatic portal hypertension or cirrhosis is associated with cardiovascular derangement. We aimed to delineate regulatory mechanisms in the brain stem cardiovascular nuclei in rat models of prehepatic portal hypertension and cirrhosis. Neuronal activation in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and ventrolateral medulla (VLM) were assessed by immunohistochemical staining for the immediate-early gene product Fos. In the same sections, catecholaminergic neurons were counted by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) staining. Ninety minutes after hypotensive hemorrhage (or no volume challenge), the animals were killed for Fos and TH medullary staining. These protocols were repeated after capsaicin administration. The NTS of unchallenged sham-operated rats had scant Fos-positive cells (3.6 +/- 0.4 cells/section), whereas hemorrhage significantly increased Fos staining (91.8 +/- 14). In contrast, the unchallenged portal hypertensive and cirrhotic groups showed increased Fos staining (14.3 +/- 5.8 and 32.8 +/- 2.8, respectively), which hemorrhage did not alter significantly. The numbers of TH-positive cells were similar in the three unchallenged groups; double labeling revealed that approximately 50% of TH-positive cells were activated by hemorrhage in the sham and cirrhotic rats but not the portal hypertensive rats. Similar patterns of Fos and TH staining were observed in the VLM. Capsaicin treatment not only significantly reduced the Fos-positive neuron numbers in portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats but also attenuated hemorrhage-induced Fos and double-positive cells in both NTS and VLM. These results suggest that disordered trafficking in capsaicin-sensitive nerves and central dysregulation contribute to blunted cardiovascular responsiveness in cirrhosis and prehepatic portal hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".