Bibliographic record
Abstract
Age specific survival and movement are important components of demography and population structure, and quantification of these rates is useful for management and conservation. However, information on the postfledging ecology of waterfowl species frequently is unavailable to managers. I studied postfledging survival and movements of juvenile Harlequin Ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus) in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, using radio marking and capture-mark-recapture analysis of banded birds captured at coastal wintering areas. Survival of juvenile females was high, providing evidence that female winter survival may be similar among age groups. Radio-marked juvenile males were more likely to die than juvenile females, and juvenile males had lowest local survival rates of all sex-age classes. Proportions of banded juveniles found at their capture location during their second winter did not differ significantly between males and females, suggesting equal dispersal rates, and at least 25% (n = 9) of radio-marked females moved >30 km from their capture location. These results were unexpected, based on previous evidence for female philopatry and theories of male- biased dispersal in waterfowl, and suggest that males and females both likely contribute to gene flow and demographic connection among populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".