Effect of gonadal hormones and sexual experience on vocalizations and behavior of male bank voles (<i>Myodes glareolus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of gonadal hormones and sexual experience on behavior, especially vocalizations, of male bank voles ( Myodes glareolus (Schreber, 1780)) during same-sex encounters in a neutral arena. Interactions within pairs of castrated males, castrated but testosterone-treated males, and sham-operated intact males were studied in the first experiment and within pairs of sexually experienced males and sexually inexperienced males in the second experiment. Castration reduced the number of ultrasonic vocalizations emitted and androgen treatment restored it to levels seen in intact males. Ultrasounds were emitted more frequently during amicable encounters than during aggressive ones, but ultrasonic calling was reduced during interactions between sexually experienced males, possibly because of the high level of aggression seen in such encounters. In contrast, audible sounds were associated with aggressive behavior and were positively affected by social experience, but they were not testosterone dependent. Neither testosterone nor sexual experience appeared to have any effect on the spectral and temporal characteristics of either audible or ultrasonic calls. The results indicate that emission of ultrasounds during same-sex encounters of male bank voles is regulated by hormonal and social factors and seems to be correlated with type of behavior shown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".