MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175193062 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2015.7334852

Exploring peer-to-peer infrastructure for Computer Supported Collaborative Work applications

2015· article· en· W2175193062 on OpenAlexaff
Tianming Wei, Yongjun Xu, Yiyun Zhao, Nishant Khanna, Bing Gao, Yvonne Coady

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceSoftware deploymentComputer-supported cooperative workPeer-to-peerUsabilityArchitectureCollaborative softwareWorld Wide WebWork (physics)MultimediaHuman–computer interactionDistributed computingSoftware engineeringOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) has been greatly enhanced by technology that provides almost real-time capture, replay, and sharing of content. “The cloud” has popularized ease of deployment for apps serviced through a centralized approach. In this work we propose a more aggressive design, decentralizing the location of shared content within a peer-to-peer structure. Ease of deployment is maintained through a novel architecture for a multilayer distributed cloud. This paper describes how this approach has shown promise in a prototype app, ThinkTogether, and the potential to enable a consistent user experience, even for remote peers sharing VoIP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207