MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PARASITE-INDUCED VARIATION IN HOST MORPHOLOGY: BRAIN-ENCYSTING TREMATODES IN FATHEAD MINNOWS

2001· article· en· W2175236422 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gregory J. Sandland, Cameron P. Goater

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parasitology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPimephales promelasJuvenileHost (biology)Parasite hostingCyprinidaeZoologyIntermediate hostContext (archaeology)TrematodaFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyAnatomyHelminthsFisheryMinnow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metacercariae of the trematode Ornithodiplostomum ptychocheilus cause a conspicuous enlargement of the cranium of juvenile fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Minnows sampled from 2 naturally infected ponds in northern Alberta, Canada, had 12% higher and 7% wider craniums compared to fish from an adjacent, uninfected pond. We tested the prediction that cranial distortion was caused by encystment of metacercariae on the brains of slow-growing minnows in a factorial experiment. Juvenile fish were either exposed once to 120 cercariae or 3 times to 40 cercariae; they were then fed either a low- or high-quantity diet for 8 wk. Results showed that after controlling for host size, cranial heights were affected by infection regime and host diet but not by the infection x diet interaction. Cranial distortion was most prominent in minnows exposed once to cercariae, showing that the rapid, simultaneous growth of metacercariae interfered with the normal development of the cranium. Thus, the expression of the parasite-induced phenotype was context dependent, the result of factors associated with the dynamics of cercariae transmission and host growth rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ParasitologySame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207