MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175262719 · doi:10.7939/r3k35mr87

Forms of Capital as Facilitators of Internationally Educated Nurses’ Integration into the Registered Nursing Workforce in Canada

2015· article· en· W2175262719 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, Christine L. Covell, Elena Neiterman

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceCapital (architecture)NursingVariety (cybernetics)VocabularyBusinessPsychologyMedicineEconomic growthEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous utilisons des données obtenues grâce à des interviews pour examiner comment des infirmières et des infirmiers ayant obtenu leur diplôme à l’étranger perçoivent les facteurs qui ont facilité leur intégration dans cette profession au Canada. Selon les participants, plusieurs facteurs entrent en jeu, et ces facteurs semblent refléter des formes de capital. Le capital économique (ressources financières disponibles) et le capital culturel (compétences linguistiques et connaissance du vocabulaire de la profession) leur ont permis de mettre à profit d’autres formes de capital afin de pouvoir faire officiellement partie de la profession et trouver ainsi du travail. Par conséquent, offrir aux infirmières et aux infirmiers ayant obtenu leur diplôme à l’étranger des ressources financières et des moyens de développer leurs compétences linguistiques pourrait les aider à avoir plus rapidement accès à la profession et à trouver un emploi au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207