MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175304730 · doi:10.1097/moo.0000000000000211

Perspectives in the reconstruction of paediatric facial paralysis

2015· review· en· W2175304730 on OpenAlexaff
Pundrique R. Sharma, Ronald M. Zuker, Gregory H. Borschel

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFacial paralysisMultidisciplinary approachFace (sociological concept)Facial reconstructionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationParalysisIntensive care medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review article, aimed at those likely to encounter but relatively unfamiliar with paediatric facial paralysis, we summarize reconstructive options in its surgical management. RECENT FINDINGS: The article looks at static and dynamic reconstructions available to address the problems encountered in the different anatomical regions of paralyzed face. SUMMARY: Although multiple surgical options are available for each anatomical region, decision-making should be taken in a multidisciplinary environment, and take into account the individual requirements of the family and patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck SurgerySame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207