MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175312311 · doi:10.1089/15246090050020664

Review: Uterine Artery Embolization: A Minimally Invasive Technique for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

2000· review· en· W2175312311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G C Wong, S. Muir, Scott Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Women s Health & Gender-Based Medicine · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUterine artery embolizationUterine fibroidsPelvic painHysterectomyEmbolizationRefractory (planetary science)Minimally invasive proceduresUterusSurgeryRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) as a primary therapy for symptomatic fibroids was first used in France in 1991. Currently, there are at least 250 centers in the United States, as well as centers in Canada and England, with experience in this technique. Initial published results worldwide indicate that after UAE, uterine fibroids shrink at least 50% in volume on average and symptoms of refractory vaginal bleeding and chronic pelvic pain are controlled in approximately 85% of patients. Major complications are rare. Overall, this technique is minimally invasive, preserves the uterus, and requires a shorter hospitalization than hysterectomy or myomectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Women s Health & Gender-Based MedicineSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207