MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175432980

III Congresso Internacional de Serviço Social: Serviço Social em tempos de incerteza

2015· article· pt· W2175432980 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria Júlia Faria Cardoso

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O contexto social, economico e politico da atualidade, ao nivel nacional, europeu e internacional, tem vindo a introduzir mudancas na vida social, na estrutura politico-organizativa do Estado e no mundo laboral, suscitando um conjunto de questoes, de incertezas e de desafios sobre os quais importa refletir.Uma das principais questoes com que se debate o pais e a do aumento da pobreza que afeta um numero cada vez maior de familias e que, conjugada com a retracao do Estado em materia de protecao social, constitui um campo de incerteza para os cidadaos e, tambem, para os profissionais que se encontram na linha da frente do atendimento das situacao de vulnerabilidade social, nao so pela diminuicao de recursos para a acao, como pela filosofia enquadradora da gestao e distribuicao das formas de ajuda, cada vez mais responsabilizadora do individuo e separada do contexto global em que emergem e se mantem os problemas e as necessidades sociais.O III Congresso Internacional de Servico Social propoe a analise e o debate da sociedade atual, a sua complexidade, as implicacoes no Servico Social e na vida profissional dos assistentes sociais, particularmente no que diz respeito as condicoes de afirmacao do projeto etico-politico do Servico Social.Apela-se a participacao da classe profissional que, diariamente, se confronta com o sofrimento dos cidadaos, com a limitacao dos recursos publicos e com a pressao das organizacoes, com a precarizacao do seu exercicio profissional, num quadro que se caracteriza pelo regresso a filantropia e a ajuda pontual e emergencial, pondo em causa os direitos sociais que constituiram a marca da Europa e das sociedades democraticas do seculo XX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207