MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175432980

III Congresso Internacional de Serviço Social: Serviço Social em tempos de incerteza

2015· article· pt· W2175432980 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria Júlia Faria Cardoso

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O contexto social, economico e politico da atualidade, ao nivel nacional, europeu e internacional, tem vindo a introduzir mudancas na vida social, na estrutura politico-organizativa do Estado e no mundo laboral, suscitando um conjunto de questoes, de incertezas e de desafios sobre os quais importa refletir.Uma das principais questoes com que se debate o pais e a do aumento da pobreza que afeta um numero cada vez maior de familias e que, conjugada com a retracao do Estado em materia de protecao social, constitui um campo de incerteza para os cidadaos e, tambem, para os profissionais que se encontram na linha da frente do atendimento das situacao de vulnerabilidade social, nao so pela diminuicao de recursos para a acao, como pela filosofia enquadradora da gestao e distribuicao das formas de ajuda, cada vez mais responsabilizadora do individuo e separada do contexto global em que emergem e se mantem os problemas e as necessidades sociais.O III Congresso Internacional de Servico Social propoe a analise e o debate da sociedade atual, a sua complexidade, as implicacoes no Servico Social e na vida profissional dos assistentes sociais, particularmente no que diz respeito as condicoes de afirmacao do projeto etico-politico do Servico Social.Apela-se a participacao da classe profissional que, diariamente, se confronta com o sofrimento dos cidadaos, com a limitacao dos recursos publicos e com a pressao das organizacoes, com a precarizacao do seu exercicio profissional, num quadro que se caracteriza pelo regresso a filantropia e a ajuda pontual e emergencial, pondo em causa os direitos sociais que constituiram a marca da Europa e das sociedades democraticas do seculo XX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0180.009
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0140.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207