Iterative multiparameter waveform inversion of precritical reflection data using prestack time Kirchhoff approximation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We have studied elastic wave scattering and iterative inversion in the context of the Kirchhoff approximation. The approach is more consistent with the weak-contrast reflectivity functions of Zoeppritz equations as compared to the Born approximation. To reduce the computational cost associated with inversion, we demonstrated the use of amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) analysis, prestack time migrations (PSTMs), and the corresponding forward modeling in an iterative scheme. Forward modeling and migration/inversion operators are based on the double-square-root (DSR) equations of PSTM and linearized reflectivity functions. All operators involved in the inversion, including the background model for DSR and AVO, are defined in P-to-P traveltime and are updated at each iteration. Our method is practical for real data applications because all operators of the inversion are known to be applicable for standard methods. We have evaluated the inversion on synthetic and real data using the waveform characteristics of P-to-P and P-to-S data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".