MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175509308

Decision Making at the Theatre Strategic Level: ISAF HQ

2012· article· en· W2175509308 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Heather Hrychuk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of military and strategic studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary History and Strategy
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfusionFunction (biology)Task (project management)PoliticsPolitical scienceProcess (computing)Public relationsProcess managementBusinessManagementComputer sciencePsychologyLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is by no means an easy task to understand the functioning of a Headquarters, oftentimes even to those working within it. Convoluted chains of command, decision making structures, and planning process can cause confusion – but so too can the effects of the political dynamics, contributions and capabilities of the various troop contributing nations that come into play in a Coalition environment. This paper aims briefly to examine these issues while providing my reflections on the function and challenges of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) headquarters (HQ) in Afghanistan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of military and strategic studiesSame topicMilitary History and StrategyFrench-language works237,207