MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175669106 · doi:10.1190/tle34080944.1

Future of tape in seismic

2015· article· en· W2175669106 on OpenAlexaff
Rune Hagelund, Nils Aatland, Sivert Kibsgaard, J. D. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIBMConfusionReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Is tape still the best choice for storage? What are the options and what are the advantages and disadvantages? For years, the industry has opted for high-end enterprise tape drives such as the IBM TS11XX series and has avoided midrange drives such as LTO because of higher-reliability drives and media and high-cost and high-value data. The current standard tape drive used in the seismic industry, the IBM TS1120 (often incorrectly referred to as 3592), which uses the 500-GB JA tape, dates from 2005 and is no longer available for purchase. (The JA tape was released in 2003.) There are various reasons why more modern drives and tapes have not become standard, and this has led to increased cost and confusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207