MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175792479 · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/l41

MULTIWAVELENGTH EVIDENCE FOR QUASI-PERIODIC MODULATION IN THE GAMMA-RAY BLAZAR PG 1553+113

2015· article· en· W2175792479 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ajello, A. Albert, W. B. Atwood, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, J. Becerra González, R. Bellazzini, E. Bissaldi, R. D. Blandford, E. D. Bloom, R. Bonino, E. Bottacini, J. Bregeon, P. Bruel, R. Buehler, S. Buson, G. A. Caliandro, R. A. Cameron, R. Caputo, M. Caragiulo, P. A. Caraveo, E. Cavazzuti, C. Cecchi, A. Chekhtman, J. Chiang, G. Chiaro, S. Ciprini, J. Cohen-Tanugi, J. Conrad, S. Cutini, A. De Angelis, R. Desiante, L. Di Venere, P. S. Drell, C. Favuzzi, S. Fegan, E. C. Ferrara, W. B. Focke, L. Fuhrmann, Y. Fukazawa, P. Fusco, F. Gargano, D. Gasparrini, N. Giglietto, P. Giommi, F. Giordano, M. Giroletti, G. Godfrey, D. Green, I. A. Grenier, J. E. Grove, S. Guiriec, A. K. Harding, E. Hays, J. W. Hewitt, A. B. Hill, D. Horan, T. Jogler, G. Jóhannesson, A. S. Johnson, T. Kamae, M. Kuss, S. Larsson, L. Latronico, J. Li, Liang Li, F. Longo, F. Loparco, B. Lott, M. N. Lovellette, P. Lubrano, J. Magill, S. Maldera, Alberto Manfreda, W. Max-Moerbeck, M. Mayer, M. N. Mazziotta, J. E. Mcenery, P. F. Michelson, T. Mizuno, M. E. Monzani, A. Morselli, I. V. Moskalenko, S. Murgia, E. Nuss, M. Ohno, T. Ohsugi, R. Ojha, N. Omodei, J. F. Ormes, D. Paneque, T. J. Pearson, J. S. Perkins, M. Perri, M. Pesce-Rollins, V. Petrosian, F. Piron, G. Pivato, T. A. Porter, R. Rando, M. Razzano, A. Reimer, O. Reimer, A. Schulz, E. J. Siskind, F. Spada, G. Spandre, P. Spinelli, D. J. Suson, H. Takahashi, J. B. Thayer, D. J. Thompson, L. Tibaldo, D. F. Torres, G. Tosti, E. Troja, Y. Uchiyama, G. Vianello, K. S. Wood, M. Wood, S. Zimmer, A. Berdyugin, R. Corbet, T. Hovatta, E. Lindfors, K. Nilsson, R. Reinthal, A. Sillanpaa, A. Stamerra, L. O. Takalo, M. J. Valtonen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersScience Mission DirectorateCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesVetenskapsrådetNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBlazarPhysicsAstrophysicsFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeBL Lac objectOscillation (cell signaling)Flux (metallurgy)Gamma rayWavelengthTelescopeActive galactic nucleusModulation (music)Period (music)GalaxyOpticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report for the first time a γ -ray and multiwavelength nearly periodic oscillation in an active galactic nucleus. Using the Fermi Large Area Telescope we have discovered an apparent quasi-periodicity in the γ -ray flux ( E > 100 MeV) from the GeV/TeV BL Lac object PG 1553+113. The marginal significance of the 2.18 ± 0.08 year period γ -ray cycle is strengthened by correlated oscillations observed in radio and optical fluxes, through data collected in the Owens Valley Radio Observatory, Tuorla, Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope, and Catalina Sky Survey monitoring programs and Swift -UVOT. The optical cycle appearing in ∼10 years of data has a similar period, while the 15 GHz oscillation is less regular than seen in the other bands. Further long-term multiwavelength monitoring of this blazar may discriminate among the possible explanations for this quasi-periodicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations260
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207